275 VS 29? Ive never riden a 29" so i am very curious, ive watched videos but looking for more input. When climbing however, even though the rear hangs up less, it did feel slightly higher geared due to the bigger wheel diameter. But if your have strong legs or don't have to climb a lot, this wouldn't be much of an issue. The700c (622 mm / 29 inches) is the most common wheel size for road racing. The 650b (584 mm / 27.5 inches) wheel size is used in specific areas. • Smoother ride due to the larger wheel diameter. • Reduced inertia when the wheel is in motion. Disadvantages • Slightly reduced acceleration due to inertia, compared to the same rim-build Thesmaller diameter of the 27.5″ wheels (vs 29″ wheels) may lead to reduced traction in these situations. The tires have a smaller area of contact with the ground compared to 29-inch wheels. This can compromise stability and control, potentially impacting the rider’s confidence on demanding terrain. Theother measurement is OD, Outside Diameter. This measurement is taken across the width of the tyre and wheel and is the effective standing height of the wheel with a fully inflated tyre attached. In terms of circumference, the 29+ wheel and tyre combo with 3.0" tyre is actually 38mm taller than a standard 29" wheel with a 2.3" tyre. Pros Dependingon how you like to ride and the sorts of trails you frequent, you can decide between a Spectral 27.5, Spectral 29 or the Spectral mullet (a 29 inch wheel at the front and a 27.5 inch wheel at the back). Shootout Wheel Wars—29 vs 27.5 vs 26. This story first appeared in our March 2012 issue, when only a few companies were offering bikes with 27.5-inch (650b) wheels. At that time, the dilemma for most riders was to choose between bikes with either 26 or 29-inch wheels. The larger-diameter 29-inch wheel has noticeably less rolling resistance. QZaz. Amullet bike is a mountain bike with a 29 inch wheel at the front and a 27.5 inch wheel at the back. You benefit from the stability of the bigger wheel at the front and Onthe other hand the diameter of 29 wheels will be 38mm greater than 27.5 so your bottom bracket will be 19mm higher. Having the center of gravity lower will feel more stable. There’s not an objective right or wrong but whatever you prefer is best to roll with. For me 3.0 is a hard lower limit with 27.5 wheels. Thatis why today we still often note tyre sizes like 26″ (now less often), 27.5″ or 29″ for MTB, and 28″ for road bicycles. A 26″ tyre fits on a rim with a 559 mm diameter. When a 2″ wide tyre is mounted on such rim, the outer diameter of such wheel with an inflated tyre is around 660 mm (26″). Theseare 29″ MTBs, where the 29″ is the diameter of the wheels these bikes use. The wheels are also the same diameter as a 700c road bike wheel. Above all, the riding experience of a fat bike vs. a 29er is one significant difference. The former adds weight and resistance while you ride, and as previously discussed, will require more MTBtire sizes: 26", 27.5", 29" etc Road bike tires also measured in a made up numbers system, just one made up by the French: 650c, 650b, 700c, 700b etc. 27.5" and 650b are the same bead seat diameter. 700c and 29" are the same bead seat diameter. This is why the only system that makes sense to measure rims in is ISO. Comparing27.5in. vs. 29in. wheels: Differences to consider for weight, acceleration, Most mountain bike manufacturers have adopted 27.5 and 29in. as the new norm and moved away from 26in. wheels. Head to head comparison: 27.5 vs 29er. a wheel with a smaller diameter will accelerate faster, partly due to the fact that wheel weight is

27.5 vs 29 wheel diameter